Oh, how I have missed The Shins (Port of Morrow review)

Port of Morrow album cover
2007 was a very different time. The iPhone didn’t exist yet, Anna Nicole Smith and Kurt Vonnegut would still be with us a little while longer, and The Shins were still releasing albums. It’s been a long time coming, but the band’s time off was time well spent. Ports of Morrow is a triumphant return for a band none of us even realized we missed.

This album is definitively The Shins. It is the same band that was playing when we all suddenly realized we loved Natalie Portman. The same band that helped spark our love for dreamy indie rock in the mid 2000s. The same band we listened to while we smoked pot in run-down college apartments, where the peeling lead paint followed our sobriety and James Mercer’s strumming.

I’m getting ahead of myself and more than a little awash in fond nostalgia. It’s great to have The Shins back but like the best friend from college you haven’t seen in years, it is a little awkward. You’ve both changed; maybe not for the better, maybe not for the worse. Things just aren’t the same.

Upon first re-introductions, you aren’t sure what to make of it. It’s familiar, but…

All the elements that make “The Shins” The Shins are here in one form or another, largely fueled by James Mercer’s uniquely beautiful crooning. Still, it isn’t quite as you remember it. The drums feel a little more prominent. There are wavy synthesizers buried in the background. The production is a little clearer, a little tighter, than we are used to.

It isn’t better, it isn’t worse. It just isn’t the same.

Maybe towards the end of your first play-through of the album, you start to warm up to it. Maybe it takes a second visit before you are comfortable with it. Eventually, if you are open to it, after all these years, you realize just how much you’ve missed The Shins.

This is a good album. Chutes Too Narrow was the band’s magnum opus, a level they will never be able to reach again; I am okay with that. The Bulls still won championships after their 72-10 season. Tarantino will never make another Pulp Fiction, but Inglourius Basterds was a great movie. You and your buddy will never forget carrying cases of beer for two miles through the Smokey Mountains, but that wasn’t the end of the good times.

In the same vein, The Shins have Port Of Morrow, and that is unquestionably a good thing.

You’ve long since moved into a comfy loft with vibrantly-painted walls. You’ve traded the bong for a 9-5 job where you probably wear a tie and look like your dad. Natalie Portman has a kid.

Things may have changed, but this is still the band you remember. It’s good to have them back in your life.

Listen on Spotify.

The Bottom Line

85/100 – Welcome back.

Listen To

Simple Song, the first single

It’s Only Life, as featured on SNL

Why I am a feminist!

“Feminism is the radical notion that women are people.”
― Gloria Naylor

Today is International Women’s Day and what a great day it is! I’m a proud feminist and so in honor of today I thought I’d give ya’ll a crash course in feminism.

If you don’t consider yourself a feminist, there is a good chance you are rolling your eyes at this point: feminists sure have gotten a bad wrap! They are man-hating, bra-burning lesbians! Suffice to say that isn’t really “a thing” in feminist circles. That perception has been covered by entire books and college courses and way too much for me to cover in one blog post but if you believe that you of all people should definitely read on.

I’ll be the first to admit I am not as well-read on the subject as many people but it’s a subject I find very important. The first step is most important so lets get to it.

Some key terms

“If all men are born free, how is it that all women are born slaves?”
― Mary Astell

Feminism means a lot of things to a lot of people so offering one, unified definition is real hard, if not impossible! That being said, I define feminism as: a belief in the social and economic equality of all people, regardless of gender.

As a feminist, I believe in the existence of Patriarchy (you definitely don’t have to be a feminist to believe in the patriarchy, it’s a pretty common idea). That is a bit harder to define but you know it when you see it. It is generally thought of as the social construct with (generally white) men at the center.

Patriarchy isn’t an organization or a club, you don’t “do” patriarchy. It is the way society has been structured over thousands of years to benefit men at the expense of women. It is similar in some degree to the systemic suppression of non-whites in the last few hundred years, so it is no surprise that the modern feminist movement was strongly intertwined with the civil rights movement!

Anyway, where is the patriarchy? Women get paid less than men for equal work? That’s patriarchy. Rush Limbaugh’s recent vile rants against Sandra Fluke? Patriarchy. The “father knows best” mentality, best exemplified by 1950s America but continues today? Patriarchy!

Those are examples of patriarchy on a societal level but it can be quite common on a personal level. I’d daresay that it happens so often on a personal level that we don’t even pay attention or realize it!

I hope you have never heard someone actually say these things because they are bad people and you shouldn’t associate with them BUT, the belief that she was “asking for it” or is a slut by dressing seductively or wearing makeup? That is called slut-shaming and that is patriarchy. Ever be a witness (or victim) of a man coming up to a woman at a bar and not flirting with them, but being downright creepy in terms of demands or physical touching? Yeah, that’s patriarchy. Women don’t have the right to an abortion? It’s a touchy subject due to the influence of religion but yeah, that’s patriarchy too.

P.S. if you refer to women as “females” on a regular basis that is DEFINITELY patriarchy.

I cannot even begin to count the number of amazing women I have encountered. Whether they are family or co-workers, casual acquaintances or lifelong friends, they are the reason I am a feminist. They deserve better.

Some quick facts

Here are some quick facts about the patriarchy, courtesy of the goons over at Something Awful.

  • Poverty rates are higher for women than men. In 2007,13.8 percent of females were poor compared to 11.1 percent of men.
  • Women are poorer than men in all racial and ethnic groups. Recent data shows that 26.5 percent of African American women are poor compared to 22.3 percent of African American men; 23.6 percent of Hispanic women are poor compared to 19.6 percent of Hispanic men; 10.7 percent of Asian women are poor compared to 9.7 percent of Asian men; and 11.6 percent of white women are poor compared to 9.4 percent of white men.
  • Black and Latina women face particularly high rates of poverty. Over a quarter of black women and nearly a quarter of Latina women are poor. Black and Latina women are at least twice as likely as white women to be living in poverty.
  • Only a quarter of all adult women (age 18 and older) with incomes below the poverty line are single mothers. Over half of all poor adult women—54 percent—are single with no dependent children.
  • Women are paid less than men, even when they have the same qualifications and work the same hours. Women who work full time earn only 77 percent of what men make—a 22 percent gap in average annual wages. Discrimination, not lack of training or education, is largely the cause of the wage gap. Even with the same qualifications, women earn less than men. In 2007, full time, year round female workers aged 25 to 32 with a bachelor’s degree were paid 14 percent less than men.
  • Women are segregated into low paying occupations, and occupations dominated by women are low paid. Women are tracked into “pink-collar” jobs such as teaching, child care, nursing, cleaning, and waitressing, which typically pay less than jobs in industries that are male-dominated. In 2007, nearly half—43 percent—of the 29.6 million employed women in the United States were clustered in just 20 occupational categories, of which the average annual median earnings were $27,383.
  • Women spend more time providing unpaid caregiving than men. Women are more likely than men to care for children and elderly or disabled family members. One study found that 69 percent of unpaid caregivers to older adults in the home are women. Because combining unpaid caregiving with paid work can be challenging, women are more likely to work part time or take time out of the workforce to care for family. Twenty-three percent of mothers are out of the workforce compared to just 1 percent of fathers.
  • Domestic and sexual violence can push women into a cycle of poverty. Experiencing domestic or sexual violence can lead to job loss, poor health, and homelessness. It is estimated that victims of intimate partner violence collectively lose almost 8 million days of paid work each year because of the violence perpetrated against them by current or former husbands, boyfriends, or dates. Half of the cities surveyed by the U.S. Conference of Mayors identified domestic violence as a primary cause of homelessness.

Further material!

The book “Feminism is for EVERYBODY” is recommended as the starting point by just about every blog I have read. I am in the middle of reading it now and while it is a bit hard to get into at first, once things start to click it makes for an enjoyable read.

Feminist Frequency is a good and accessible vlog.

Here is a smattering of good ol’ fashioned blogs: Feministing, BtchFlcks, Finally Feminism 101.

Super Tuesday, Super Boring

Meet your candidates.

Meet your candidates.

Can you smell that in the air? It must be Super Tuesday! 10 states will be hitting the polls to vote in the Republican primary (technically the Democratic primary too but, spoiler alert, Obama is going to win that). Unfortunately, this year isn’t going to be nearly as super and I can say with some certainty that this primary race will not be over by the end of the day.

There are 424 delegates at stake today (1,144 is the magic number needed) but most of these delegates will be awarded proportionally instead of winner-takes-all, meaning a second or even third place win could net at least SOME delegates. With four remaining candidates, the delegate split will be too great to put an end to the primary.

Perception is everything. A slim victory margin in a proportional state won’t net a candidate any noticeable gains in the delegate math but they will be able to chuck the state into their ‘victory’ column, giving at least the perception of momentum. In a race that has been defined by the “inevitable” candidate and the so-called “Not Romney,” the stakes are clear: Mitt Romney needs a respectable showing to fend off the question “is he the best we can do?” and the Not Romneys, well, need to show that they can beat Romney.

Each candidate has a different approach. Newt Gingrich is bunkering down in Georgia, hoping for a combination of a strong win in his home state and a solid Romney performance to bump Rick Santorum down. Rick Santorum is hoping to fortify his second-place position with strong performances in the South and an upset in Ohio. Ron Paul looks to do well in caucuses while playing the ‘delegate math’ game, picking off as many delegates as he can on the way to 1,144. Mitt Romney will have strong performances in Massachusetts and Virginia, where only he and Ron Paul are on the ballot.

State breakdown

Alaska (27 delegates) - Delegates here are awarded by caucus, a realm where Ron Paul is supposedly strong. Combined with the difficulty in polling the state and a lack of advertisements (Romney has leaned heavily on bombarding a state with ads to win), it is nearly impossible to predict how it will play out.

Georgia (76 delegates) - This is Newt Gingrich’s home state and where he has spent most of his time campaigning. There is no way he won’t come out big here and he could even crack 50%. He is banking on a stellar performance here to provide some much-needed energy (and money) to his campaign.

Idaho (32 delegates) - Although this is another caucus state, it also has a large Mormon population, who have thus far come out in droves for Mitt Romney. Expect a solid performance from him here.

Massachusetts (41 delegates) - Mitt Romney was governor of the state from 2002 to 2006 and candidates need to cross a 15% threshold to be awarded delegates. Expect a clean sweep from Romney.

North Dakota (28 delegates) - The third caucus state voting this Super Tuesday. Ron Paul is hoping for a strong showing here to net him his first state win.

Ohio (66 delegates) - Rick Santorum had held a respectable lead in Ohio but Mitt Romney has closed the gap to a statistical tie. Proportionality renders a lot of this moot, but no Republican has won the presidency without carrying Ohio. A win here for Santorum will go a long way towards supporting his case of electability in the general election against Barack Obama.

Oklahoma (43 delegates) - If a candidate breaks the 50% marker here they are awarded all the delegates, but that won’t be happening. Rick Santorum has polled relatively well here but in recent days Mitt Romney has again closed the gap. Expect a Santorum win but not a large net gain in delegates.

Tennessee (58 delegates) - Rick Santorum has the slimmest of leads here and is a must-win for him. Again, perception is everything.

Vermont (17 delegates) - Close to Mitt Romney’s home state of Massachusetts, expect him to perform quite well here.

Virginia (49 delegates) - An unusually high, unusually early, signature requirement means only Mitt Romney and Ron Paul appear on the ballot. Romney will absolutely clean up here and put a major damper on any big Gingrich gains out of Georgia.

Predictions

Super Tuesday is Romney’s to lose, but don’t expect that to happen. My predictions are a little generous in giving Alaska to Ron Paul and that is mostly out of some insane desire of mine to see the doctor pick up a little steam. The only real question is who will win Ohio. I can feel in my gut that the SuperPAC/advertisement blitz by Romney will net him a win there, but you never know.

 Gingrich - Georgia

Paul - Alaska

Romney - Massachusetts, Virginia, North Dakota, Idaho, Vermont

Santorum - Ohio, Tennessee, Oklahoma

What’s next?

Mitt Romney is going to clean house but the delegate math (are you sensing any key points yet?) is going to keep this race running. Newt Gingrich could bow out gracefully after a big win in his home state but with a man like him, you never know. Don’t expect too much to change after Super Tuesday, this slug fest is going to keep on truckin’.

Read the full schedule of primary dates.